3 1.04m-Dot 3-Way Tilt LCD Touchscreen. 325-Point Intelligent Hybrid AF System. 1080p at 120 fps; Flicker Reduction Mode. 1.28âł Sub-LCD Top Screen. Weather-Sealed Body; 2 UHS-II SD Slots. Offering plenty of features inside a durable magnesium-alloy housing, the FUJIFILM X-H1 Mirrorless Digital Camera from Fujifilm aims to position itself
Letâs compare the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Fujifilm has unveiled the X-H1 mirrorless camera with megapixel APS-C sized X-Trans CMOS III sensor and X-Processor Pro image processing engine. Even the new X-H1 has the same sensor in resolution to the Sony A6500, it has a significantly larger and heavier body. In our opinion, the X-H1 is quite expensive. Do you think that the X-H1, with the price tag of only $1,900, offers enough features against the A6500? The Fujifilm X-H1 is the companyâs highest performance APS-C model with most video-capable features. Itâs based on the X-T2 but adds in-body image stabilization as well as DCI 4K and more comprehensive set of video options. If youâre trying to decide which one to buy as your first camera, check out the differences between the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Specifications Comparison of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 Cameras Below you can see the specs comparison table of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Some differences like sensor, image size, shooting speed, lcd size etc.. detailed as bold on the table. Fujifilm X-H1 Sony A6500 Sensor resolution 24MP 24MP Sensor size APS-C APS-C Image Stablization 5-axis, 5-axis Burst speed 14 fps with e-shutter, 8 fps mechanical 11 with grip 11 fps AF Joystick? 8-way No Touchscreen Yes Yes Screen articulation Two-axis tilt Tilt EVF dots dots Viewfinder magnification RAW buffer 40 231 JPEG buffer 27 110 Video Bit depth 8 8 Max bitrate 200 Mbps 100 Mbps Mic / Headphone sockets? Yes / On VPB-XH1 accessory grip Yes / No Log capture? Yes Yes HDMI Micro Micro USB Micro Type B Micro Type B Battery life CIPA 310 310 Dimensions x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Weight with card and battery 673g 453g Price body only $1,900 $1,298 FUJIFILM X-H1 advantages over Fujifilm X-T2 In-body image stabilization â Yes Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds Higher Max Flash Sync Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots Dual Card Slots â Yes Always-on wireless connectivity Top Deck Display â Yes Check settings with a screen on top of the camera Faster burst rate 14fps vs 11 fps Faster Shutter Speed 1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec Sony A6500 advantages over FUJIFILM X-H1 Less Expensive â Save money for lenses or accessories Built-in NFC Yes Internal Flash Yes Thinner and Lighter Bigger JPEG and RAW BufferImaging The FUJIFILM X-H1 uses the APS-C size X-Transâą CMOS III sensor (24.30 million pixels, without low-pass filter) and the high-speed image processing engine X-Processor Pro. When used in combination with the extremely high-quality FUJINON lens, as well as the unique color reproduction technology developed by FUJIFILM more than 8 decades
Two years ago, Fujifilm announced its most popular X-Series camera to date, the X-T2. It was one of many âsecond generationâ mirrorless cameras to hit the market that year and included characteristics one would expect from a high-end product such as a more robust housing, an improved autofocus system and 4K recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 is built upon the strengths of the X-T2, making it the most powerful X-Series camera in the this comparison preview, weâre going to take a look at how the new X-H1 compares to one of its main rivals on the mirrorless market, the Sony a6500. Despite sharing similar characteristics, including a 24MP APS-C sensor, advanced hybrid autofocus system, 5-axis sensor stabilisation and advanced video capabilities, there are quite a few ways in which they differ as weâll discover statement The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications, press releases and our personal experience with the Sony a6500 and Fujifilm cameras. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thank you!1. SLR vs. rangefinder designPerhaps the most obvious difference is the physical appearance of the two X-H1 resembles a typical SLR due to its centrally-placed electronic viewfinder EVF. It is both larger and heavier than the a6500 with measurements of x x and a weight of 673g with the battery and memory a6500 weighs approximately 453g with the battery and SD card and measures x x It has a flat-topped rangefinder-type body with the electronic viewfinder located on the left side of the the X-H1 features a thick, scratch-proof chassis that is completely weather-sealed against dust, moisture and cold temperatures down to -10°C, the a6500 only offers dust and moisture resistance. Both bodies feature a prominent grip but the X-H1, being taller, should prove more comfortable to difference that will interest professionals is that the X-H1 has a dual SD card slot with UHS-II compatibility, whereas the a6500 only has one UHS-I. Dual SD card slots are useful, not only because you can record more images but also because a you can make back-ups while shooting and b have the camera record different file types JPG, RAW, MP4 to separate X-H1 comes with a full sized USB port whereas the a6500 comes with a Micro USB 2 port. A hot shoe is present on both bodies but only the a6500 has a built-in pop-up External controls and ease of useA characteristic common to all Fujifilm X-Series cameras is the presence of many physical controls around the the case of the X-H1, you will find the following a stacked ISO/Drive dial, stacked Shutter Speed/Metering dial, front and rear control dials, AF joystick, focus selector on the front and various function buttons around the body. Add to this the small LCD screen on top that displays your settings, remaining battery life and other useful information, and it becomes easy to understand why the Fujifilm camera should give you a more immersive user a6500 has fewer external controls which include the standard PSAM dial, one exposure dial on top and a rear control wheel. There is a good number of function buttons and a customisable Fn menu but it still isnât as user-friendly as we would like it to menu system on the X-H1 is the same found on the X-T2, which is another advantage it is more straightforward to navigate and learn than the one on the a6500. Both cameras come with a Q Menu / Fn menu that can be worth mentioning is that most Fujinon lenses have a physical aperture dial while many Sony lenses donâ Viewfinder and Rear LCD screenWe already touched upon the location of the X-H1 and a6500âs respective viewfinders but there are also a few other differences worth the X-H1âs is larger vs inches, has a higher resolution vs. dots and a higher magnification vs Second, they offer slightly different refresh rates 50fps and 100fps PAL or 60fps and 120fps NTSC for the Sony, or 60fps / 100fps in Boost mode for the cameras have a 3-inch LCD screen but they work the X-H1 has a three-way tilting monitor that rotates up, down and to one side in order to facilitate both landscape and portrait shooting, the a6500âs screen only tilts up and down. The resolution of the a6500âs screen is also slightly lower at approximately 921k dots versus dots on the tilting mechanism on the X-H1They do share one important feature however and that is touch sensitivity. On the X-H1 you can change the AF point, focus, take a shot, swipe through your images and pinch to zoom. The touch screen can also be used as an AF Pad when composing with the the a6500, the touch screen can only be used to move the focus point which also works when using the viewfinder.4. Sensor and Image QualityAlthough the performance is very similar, there are a few things worth highlighting if you are picky about image quality. The following is based on our X-T2 vs a6500 full comparison, which can give you a good preview of how the two sensors perform since the X-H1 uses the same sensor as the the X-H1 uses an X-Trans array rather than the traditional bayer array, which includes at least one red, green and blue pixel on every horizontal and vertical line of the debate as to whether this technology is an advantage is on-going at the time of writing. In our opinion, the differences arenât huge but it is true that the Fuji RAW files can perform differently depending on the post production software if you want to maximise sharpness and fine details. The a6500 RAW files by comparison deliver good results with most software Sony has a normal range of ISO 100-25600 and an extended value of 51200. The X-H1 has a native 200-12800 range, pull value down to 100 and push levels up to 51200. The difference in performance between the two sensors is very small, and weâve found that the Fuji RAW files require less noise reduction to get rid of colour noise. Brightness when shooting at the same ISO value is not exactly the same however the Fuji files are often underexposed by half a stop as both brands use a different ISO range also comes very close. The X-H1 can record 14-bit RAW in lossless compressed or uncompressed, whereas the a6500 records 14-bit compressed difference concerns the picture profiles and colour rendering. Fujifilm has a more subtle yet distinctive colour signature thanks to its film simulation 5-axis stabilisationAlthough we already mentioned this in the introduction, we wanted to highlight a few differences since this technology is a first for cameras can use 5 axes with non-stabilised lenses but the performance can vary with the X-H1 depending on the lens used. While Sony guarantees up to 5 stops of compensation with all native lenses, the X-H1 offers slightly more with a few prime lenses such as the XF 35mm f/ OIS lenses, the a6500 uses 3 axes on the sensor and two Yaw / Pitch axes on the lens. The X-H1 has a similar behaviour although the number of axes used on the sensor may vary depending on the focal length. The performance can decrease to or even with select OIS lenses like the XF Autofocus capabilitiesBoth cameras feature a hybrid autofocus systems consisting of a mix of contrast and phase detection X-H1 has 91 points, with the 49 central ones being phase detection points, covering roughly 40% of the sensor area. In certain modes you can sub-divide them into a 13Ă25 grid 325 points. XH1 7Ă13 grid XH1 13Ă25 gridIt comes with Fujifilmâs AF-C Custom Settings which allow you to customise the speed and reactivity of the autofocus, as well as the area of the image it a6500 has more points 425 phase detection and 169 contrast detection points that cover almost the entire sensor surface. Using its advanced 4D Focus hybrid autofocus system and high-density tracking AF, the camera activates a large number points around a subject to track it more efficiently. 425 phase detection points on the a6500 169 contrast detection points on the a6500When we compared the a6500 to the X-T2 â whose AF system is almost identical to that of the X-H1 â we found that they were equally capable of tracking subjects with precision. That being said, the new camera has an improved algorithm that should increase precision when tracking fast subjects such as birds, so weâll have to see if this brings a tangible difference in field advantage of the a6500 is that you can easily adapt DSLR lenses and retain excellent AF performance with the right adaptor such as the Sigma Shutter and burst speedsBoth the X-H1 and a6500 have mechanical, electronic and first curtain electronic shutter options but they offer different a6500âs maximum shutter speed is 1/4000s regardless of the shutter mechanism you for the X-H1, the mechanical shutter can reach 1/8000s while the electronic shutter is even faster at 1/32, continuous shooting mode, both cameras can go as fast as 11fps but the vertical battery grip is required to reach this speed with the Fujifilm camera â otherwise the maximum is 8fps. With the electronic shutter, the X-H1 can go as fast as Video capabilitiesThe video capabilities of the X-H1 and a6500 are similar in so far as both can shoot in 4K resolution up to 30fps but there are also a number of differences that may be of interest to video both offer full pixel readout, the a6500 doesnât crop the sensor. This means that unlike the X-H1, which performs a crop, the field of view doesnât maximum data rate of the X-H1 is 200Mbps 4K and 1080p whereas the a6500 is capped at 100Mbps for 4K and 50Mbps for Full can record up to 120fps in 1080p which allows you create nice slow motion footage but only the a6500 offers a Quick motionâ option down to maximum time for the a6500 is 30 minutes in 4K and Full HD whereas the X-H1 cannot record for longer than 15 minutes in 4K or 20 minutes in Full HD. However, you can extend the recording time to 30 minutes for both resolutions by attaching the vertical battery find a microphone input but no headphone output on the a6500. On the X-H1 however, you can gain access to one if you attach the optional battery Picture profiles for videoThe X-H1 becomes the second Fujifilm camera after the X-T2 to feature the flat F-Log Gamma profile it allows you to record the vastest dynamic range possible which is useful for grading in post-production. The difference with the X-T2 however is that the X-H1 lets you record it internally to an SD card in 420 8-bit, eliminating the need for an external picture profiles otherwise known as Film Simulation Modes can also be used for video. There is a new one currently exclusive to the X-H1 called Eterna which has been developed for video and gives you a very distinctive cinematic look see the example below by Herman Van Deventer.The a6500 has more picture profiles designed especially for video nine in total. These include in-depth settings such as black gamma, knee, colour depth, colour modes, gamma modes and S-log2 / S-log3 to record the widest dynamic range Native lens selectionThis final point isnât directly related to the X-H1 and a6500 in and of themselves but rather to lens systems to which are inextricably Sony APS-C lens range, while far from scant, has a disproportionate number of slow aperture lenses. Granted, there are some f/ portrait primes, f/4 zoom lenses, and some third-party primes from Sigma and Zeiss, but if youâre looking for top quality, the Fujifilm X series has more complete lens ecosystem on second issue is that the Sony APS-C lens range isnât being updated nearly as regularly as the Fujifilm X series. This is because Sony is currently funnelling all R&D into full-frame lenses which, despite having the same E-mount, tend to be too large and dare I say too expensive for APS-C details aside, it is fair to say that the Fujifilm X-H1 and Sony a6500 are actually quite similar, at least as far as the image quality, autofocus and video capabilities are most significant difference, in our opinion, is the handling and user experience. The X-H1, though larger and heavier than the a6500, appears to be a beautifully designed camera with an excellent grip and lots of external controls that are straightforward to use from the moment you unbox it. Whatâs more, it can benefit from the optional vertical grip that enhances the ergonomics, battery life and performance for demanding the a6500 has compactness on its side but it isnât quite as user friendly. Whatâs more, small bodies can be less advantageous when used with a heavy telephoto it comes to the price, however, it is the Sony camera that has a clear upper hand. In fact, by choosing the a6500 body instead of the X-H1, you can expect to save around $500 excluding special offers or discounts. The Sony costs around $1400 / ÂŁ1350 / âŹ1340 whereas the X-H1 is $1900 / ÂŁ1700 / âŹ1900 body only.Check the price of the Fujifilm X-H1 on Amazon B&H PhotoCheck price of the Sony a6500 on Amazon Amazon UK B&H Photo eBayEnjoyed this article? Then you may also like the followingFujifilm X-T2 vs X-Pro2 â Complete comparisonFujifilm X-T2 vs X-T20 â Complete comparisonFujifilm X-H1 vs X-T2 â Comparison previewFujifilm X-T2 vs a6500 â Complete comparison
SonyA7III vs Fuji XT3 - Fujifilm X-T3 Challenges Full Frame. Sony A7III vs Sony A6500 - How much better is the A7III? XT3's 10 bit is fairly important for video. Also consider Fuji XH1, a bigger grip than the XT3. XH1 is a great value compared to cameras from other brands, but less features than XT3. Some things can be learned
Comparison Max. image resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000 Sensor Sensor size x mm x mm Sensor resolution 6058 x 4012 6045 x 4003 Diagonal mm mm Sensor size comparison Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older. Learn more about sensor sizes » Actual sensor size Note Actual size is set to screen â change » vs 1 1 ratio Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Surface area Difference 0 mmÂČ 0% X-H1 and Alpha a6500 sensors are the same size. Note You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm X-H1 2018 and Sony Alpha a6500 2016. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel photosite to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range. Difference ”m Pixel pitch of Alpha a6500 is approx. higher than pixel pitch of X-H1. Pixel area ”mÂČ Â”mÂČ Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel. Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions more detail for a given sensor size. Relative pixel sizes Pixel area difference ”mÂČ A pixel on Sony Alpha a6500 sensor is approx. bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-H1. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor. Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels. Difference ”m Fujifilm X-H1 has approx. higher pixel density than Sony Alpha a6500. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Specs Effective megapixels ISO sensitivity Auto, 200-12800 extends to 100-51200 Auto, 100-25600 expandable to 51200 Focal length 35mm equiv. Aperture priority Yes Yes Max. aperture 35mm equiv. n/a n/a Metering Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Exposure compensation ±5 EV in 1/3 EV steps ±5 EV in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps Min. shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Max. shutter speed 1/8000 sec 1/4000 sec Viewfinder Electronic Electronic White balance presets 7 8 Screen resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots Max. video resolution 4096x2160 24p 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo USB USB 5 GBit/sec USB 480 Mbit/sec Battery NP-W126S lithium-ion battery NP-FW50 Lithium-ion battery Dimensions x x mm 120 x x mm Choose cameras to compare Popular comparisons Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS R Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D810 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D7200 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T1 Diagonal Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem where w = sensor width and h = sensor height Fujifilm X-H1 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = â + = mm Sony Alpha a6500 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = â + = mm Surface area Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor. X-H1 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = Ă = mmÂČ Alpha a6500 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = Ă = mmÂČ Pixel pitch Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers ”m. It can be calculated with the following formula Pixel pitch = sensor width in mm Ă 1000 sensor resolution width in pixels X-H1 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Pixel pitch = Ă 1000 = ”m 6058 Alpha a6500 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Pixel pitch = Ă 1000 = ”m 6045 Pixel area The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch Pixel area = pixel pitchÂČ You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels Pixel area = sensor surface area in mmÂČ effective megapixels X-H1 pixel area Pixel pitch = ”m Pixel area = = ”mÂČ Alpha a6500 pixel area Pixel pitch = ”m Pixel area = = ”mÂČ Pixel density Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula Pixel density = sensor resolution width in pixels ÂČ / 1000000 sensor width in cm One could also use this formula Pixel density = effective megapixels Ă 1000000 / 10000 sensor surface area in mmÂČ X-H1 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6058 / / 1000000 = MP/cmÂČ Alpha a6500 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6045 / / 1000000 = MP/cmÂČ Sensor resolution Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum not interpolated image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages. 1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter aspect ratio. It's usually 43 or 32, but not always. 2. With the ratio r known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels X Ă r Ă X = effective megapixels Ă 1000000 â X = â effective megapixels Ă 1000000 r 3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio Resolution horizontal X Ă r Resolution vertical X X-H1 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = â Ă 1000000 = 4012 Resolution horizontal X Ă r = 4012 Ă = 6058 Resolution vertical X = 4012 Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012 Alpha a6500 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = â Ă 1000000 = 4003 Resolution horizontal X Ă r = 4003 Ă = 6045 Resolution vertical X = 4003 Sensor resolution = 6045 x 4003 Crop factor Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film mm with the diagonal of the sensor. Crop factor = mm sensor diagonal in mm X-H1 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = Alpha a6500 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = 35 mm equivalent aperture Equivalent aperture in 135 film terms is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor focal length multiplier. X-H1 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Fujifilm X-H1, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Fujifilm X-H1 is Alpha a6500 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Sony Alpha a6500, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Sony Alpha a6500 is More comparisons of Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D850 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS M50 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II Enter your screen size diagonal My screen size is inches Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen phone, tablet, or monitor is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
VadÀr skillnaden mellan Sony Alpha a6500 och Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F OIS? Ta reda pÄ vilka som Àr bÀttre och deras totala prestanda i kamerarankningen. Specifikationer + LÀgg till i jÀmförelse. Home > JÀmför kameror > Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS vs Sony Alpha a6500. 61 poÀng. Fujifilm X Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha ILCE-A6500 Sensor and Camera Features Brand Fujifilm Sony Megapixels Sensor Type CMOS CMOS Sensor Format APS-C APS-C SLR Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Crop Factor AA Filter Not needed Fixed Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 Body Image Stabilization Yes Yes Native ISO Min 200 - Max 12800 Min 100 - Max 25600 Full ISO Settings AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Startup Time seconds AF System and Shooting Auto Focus Type Hybrid Phase/Contrast Detect AF 325 points total, 169 phase-detect points; Single point AF EVF / LCD 13x7 / 25x13 changeable size of AF frame among 5 types, Zone AF 3x3 / 5x5 / 7x7 from 91 areas on 13x7 grid, Wide/Tracking AF Up to 18 area Hybrid Contrast/Phase Detection Wide 425 points phase-detection AF, 169 points contrast-detection AF, Zone, Center, Flexible Spot Small / Medium / Large, Expanded Flexible Spot Continuous Shooting Speed / Burst Mode AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Shutter Speed Range 1/32000 - 900 sec 1/4000 - 30 sec Bulb Mode Yes Yes JPEG Buffer Size 40 231 AW Buffer Size 27 110 Screen/viewfinder LCD LCD Resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots 307,200 px Touchscreen Yes Yes Articulating Screen Yes Yes Tilt Swivel Screen No No Selfie Screen No No Top Deck Display Yes No Focus Peaking Yes Yes Viewfinder EVF / LCD EVF / LCD Viewfinder Type EVF OLED with 100% coverage, magnification 35mm format equivalent, 23mm eyepoint from the rear end of the cameras eyepiece, -4 to +2 diopter adjustment, eye sensor EVF type; XGA OLED, 100% coverage, mag. 35mm eq., 23mm eyepoint, -4 to +3 diopter Focus Peaking Yes Yes Video Features Video Resolution 4096x2160 24p/ 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Video File Format MOV MPEG-4 AVC / with linear PCM stereo sound XAVC S / AVCHD format Ver. compliant / MP4; Audio LPCM, 2ch / Dolby Digital AC-3, 2ch, Dolby Digital Stereo Creator / MPEG-4 AAC-LC, 2ch Memory Card Type SD / SDHC / SDXC MS PRO Duo / SD / SDHC / SDXC Dual Card Slot Yes No SD UHS Support Microphone Jack Yes Yes Headphone Jack No No Flash and Internal Connections Built-in Flash No Yes Max Flash Sync Speed 1/250 1/160 Internal connections Micro HDMI Type D, PC-Sync, stereo mic jack, remote jack; optional battery grip provides a headphone jack Micro Type-D HDMI, Multi Interface Shoe, Multi Micro USB Connectivity Built-In Wi-Fi Yes Yes NFC No Yes Bluetooth Yes Yes Built-In GPS No No USB Type USB Super Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi USB High Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi Physical Battery Life CIPA 300 shots 310 shots Battery Types Lithium-ion rechargeable Lithium-ion rechargeable Weight oz 673 g includes batteries oz 453 g includes batteries Size x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Price Price Buy starting from $1, Buy starting from $1, Release Date 2018-03-01 2016-11-15
Itseems pretty obvious that the Fujifilm X-S10 and the Sony A6500 will be direct competitors. The A6500 is aesthetically uninspiring, so despite my misgivings about the X-S10's body design, it still wins hands down over the Sony model, in my opinion. XH1 probably was about to be abandoned because it sold badly. And the reason was not in
1 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Last edited Jun 15, 2019 2 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Thanks for the research! 3 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed 4 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed Thanks so much Chuck and Shadowside Crop? I'm very poor in math, so bare with me here First I scale the original down from 6000px to 3000px in photoshop then copy and paste those images in 1600px X 1607px new document to post in here at 100% 5 To my eyes, the Sony with NR looks the best. 6 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. This subject is already waxy, so no real harm done. But, what this test does reveal well is how the noise has been handled in the mid-tone areas and in retaining a lot of the details in the beads and around the eyes. All in, very impressive how far along this technology has come. 7 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light 8 +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC 9 What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. Last edited Jun 15, 2019 10 Huge diff in sharpness 11 I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC Because, ppl call them kit lens, does not mean, they are equal. What you can get for $150? Waste of money. 12 The Sony lens looks pretty sharp to me. Both cameras performed really good here IMO. 13 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. 14 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me 15 Just for curious, I went and take a shot at 1/6s yes still hand held Still holding its sharpness, crazy little camera Last edited Jun 16, 2019 16 That's really impressive for hand held but I do see some softness in that image of I pixel peep. 17 Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me Amazing! Hoping Fuji will eventually figure out a way to offer IBIS in some of their smaller, more affordable bodies. 18 Aww, man, Alisa? Pfft. You gotta get some Julia or Zafina in there, stat. Good on you for doing a second test without the Sony multi-frame NR. It does go to show how much work the software is doing. But hey, you're getting the results you want and that's what matters. Still, now use that feature on a tripod and you'll really blow peoples' minds. What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. It's not so much a different "scale" as it is that camera ISOs are poorly-defined in the first place and to account for manufacturing tolerances any manufacturer is allowed to label pretty much any ISO whatever they like, which they all abuse; Fuji just abuse that chance even more than the others. Except the Canon 80D, which is an almost exact copy, ISO-wise, of Fuji. Of course in this example the lens is different, too, and there could be different transmission even at the same aperture, further exaggerating the difference in exposure. But all that only matters when you are comparing two different cameras directly head-to-head like this and you're trying to match your results by copying the numbers. For 'real' shooting you can just use your eyes, forget the numbers even exist at all, and just shift stuff up or down until it looks right. 'S what I do most of the time, to be honest. Sticking the camera on auto ISO and then just using exposure compensation to get the brightness looking right on the screen, ignoring what ISO number the camera claims to be using, is a big headache-saver. I never mix systems in a shoot so Fuji's massive over-valuing of their ISO ratings doesn't actually cause a problem.theX-H1 [is] up against some pretty fierce competition: Sony, for example, offers the broadly comparable a6500 for less money or the impressive-looking full-frame a7 III for only a little more. Fujifilm X-H1: Cameralabs. Cameralabs provide one of the most detailed reviews available, here are the bits I found interesting:
Fujifilm X-H1Sony Alpha a6500Why is Fujifilm X-H1 better than Sony Alpha a6500? faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format?14fpsvs11fps50% faster maximum shutter speed?1/8000svs1/4000sHas timelapse function? more battery power?1200mAhvs1100mAhHas dual card slots?1 newer USB version?3vs210°C lower potential operating temperature?-10°Cvs0°CWhy is Sony Alpha a6500 better than Fujifilm X-H1?100 more focus points?425vs32540shots longer battery life?350shotsvs310shots220g lighter?453gvs673gHas a BSI sensor?Has a flash? less body volume? NFC? narrower? EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMNikon D600 + AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm VRCanon EOS Rebel SL2 + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMFujifilm X-T30 + Fujifilm XF 18-55mm f/ R LM OISNikon D7100 + 18-105mm f/ ED VR DXCanon EOS 77D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS USMNikon Z50 + Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm f/ VRCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS M6 + Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/ IS STMUser reviewsDesignType Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The type of viewfinder EVFElectronic viewfinder EVFThe type of viewfinder that the camera device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your resolution Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Fujifilm X-H1 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500An electronic viewfinder EVF with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually screens can be useful for tricky 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking bigger the screen size is, the better the user of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image mount Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an ISO Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Fujifilm X-H1With a higher light sensitivity ISO level, the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain sensor shift, the image sensor rather than the lens moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being continuous shooting is useful for catching action AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and recording movies they stay focussed and microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the bitrate Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if battery can be recharged and used over indicator shows you when the device has low power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery device can connect to is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more camera can take a series of shots, shifting the sensor slightly with each one. These can then be combined to create an extremely high-resolution image. Itâs particularly useful for things like photographing raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write Wi-Fi versions supported by the technology allows the users to use their smartphone as a remote control for the with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Show allThis page is currently only available in English.
